Skip to main content

How Journey Insights Hub analyzes open-ended feedback

How Journey Insights Hub understands the meaning, context and relationships within open-ended feedback.

Journey Insights Hub uses natural language understanding to identify the meaning, themes, and relationships within open-ended feedback.

Instead of relying only on keywords or requiring teams to manually define every topic in advance, the tool learns directly from the language in your data. This makes it possible to analyze sources such as survey responses, reviews, support tickets, chat transcripts and employee feedback quickly and at scale.

Learn the language of your data

When you create a text analysis project, Journey Insights Hub analyzes how words and phrases are used throughout the dataset. It learns:

  • Which concepts are related

  • How terminology is used in context

  • Which topics are most relevant to the feedback being analyzed

For example, customers may describe the same issue using phrases such as “slow response,” “long wait,” “delayed reply,” or “it took days to hear back.”

Rather than treating each phrase as unrelated, Journey Insights Hub may recognize that they all refer to response time.

Why this matters: Journey Insights Hub can organize feedback according to meaning, even when different people describe the same experience in different ways.

Understand words through context

Journey Insights Hub represents words and concepts using mathematical models called word embeddings. Each embedding contains hundreds of dimensions that capture different aspects of meaning and nuance.

Words and concepts used in similar ways are positioned closer together within a semantic space. This semantic space represents the concepts found in the project and the relationships among them.

For example, the word “support” could refer to:

  • Assistance from a service team

  • Technical compatibility for a feature

  • Internal support from a manager

Journey Insights Hub evaluates the surrounding language and the broader context of the project to understand how the term is being used in a particular response.

Similarly, the word “issue” might refer to a billing error, login problem, product defect, or delivery delay. Context helps the platform distinguish among these experiences and reduces the limitations of keyword searches, which may overlook related wording or combine unrelated uses of the same term.

Combine general language knowledge with domain-specific terminology

Journey Insights Hub begins with an existing understanding of language. Its natural language modeling technology draws on a background semantic model containing general relationships among words and concepts.

The background space contains general relationships between concepts and reflects common knowledge about how words and ideas relate to one another. It then applies that general understanding to your text analysis project data. Through a process known as transfer learning, it adapts its existing language knowledge to the terminology used in your organization, industry, or research area.

For example, customers may refer to a feature using:

  • Its official name

  • An abbreviation

  • An internal product label

  • An informal description

By examining how those terms appear throughout the feedback, Journey Insights Hub can begin identifying that they refer to the same or closely related parts of the experience. It can also begin recognizing emerging terminology, such as the name of a newly released feature or a phrase customers have started using to describe a recent problem.

Since the platform combines existing language knowledge with the patterns found in the project, it does not require supervised training or thousands of manually labeled examples to begin producing useful analysis.

How this differs from traditional ontologies

An ontology is a structured collection of terms, categories and relationships created for a particular subject area.

Ontologies can provide detailed and accurate domain knowledge, but they often require specialists to create, maintain, and update them.

For example, a customer-service ontology may include predefined categories such as billing, technical support, account access, and delivery. When customers begin discussing a new feature, policy, or recurring problem, those terms and relationships may need to be added manually before the system can classify them correctly.

Journey Insights Hub takes a different approach:

Traditional ontologies

Journey Insights Hub

Use predefined terms, categories, and relationships

Learns terminology and relationships from the data

Often require specialists to create and maintain them

Reduces the need for manual setup

New terminology may need to be added manually

Can begin recognizing new language through context

May require labeled examples or extensive preparation

Allows teams to begin analyzing feedback more quickly

Apply an established structure to the text

Builds a model reflecting the language used in the project

As a result, teams can begin analyzing feedback without first building a large custom ontology or labeling thousands of examples. Concept lists, Science assertions, and other configuration tools can then be used to refine the analysis around established business definitions and project requirements.

From language to insights

Once Journey Insights Hub creates a semantic space for a text analysis project, Journey Insights Hub uses that model to help you explore and quantify your feedback.

You can use the platform to:

  • Identify prominent themes and concepts

  • Discover relationships between topics

  • Understand sentiment toward different aspects of an experience

  • Compare feedback across segments or time periods

  • Find issues that are emerging within the data

  • Explore the records behind individual findings

For example, an analysis may reveal that negative feedback about account access is closely connected to password resets, verification steps, and delayed support responses.

It may also show that these concerns appear more frequently among new customers or increased after a recent process change. The result is a structured view of qualitative feedback that helps teams move from large volumes of text to findings they can investigate and act on.

Did this answer your question?